OX Security vs Apiiro

Quick Verdict

OX Security and Apiiro are both leading ASPM platforms recognized by Gartner and IDC, but they solve the application security problem from different starting points. OX Security built its platform around software supply chain protection, using its proprietary Pipeline Bill of Materials (PBOM) to map every component, dependency, and build step from code to cloud. Apiiro built its platform around contextual risk analysis, using a Risk Graph that connects code changes, developer behavior, and runtime signals to surface the risks that actually matter.

For organizations where supply chain integrity and CI/CD pipeline security are the primary concern — particularly those in regulated industries or those responding to requirements like SLSA and SSDF — OX Security provides purpose-built capabilities. For organizations drowning in security findings that need intelligent prioritization based on business context, developer risk profiles, and actual exploitability, Apiiro’s Risk Graph delivers the signal-to-noise improvement that security teams need.

Both platforms consolidate findings from dozens of security tools into a single view. The question is which lens you want to look through: supply chain integrity or contextual risk.

Feature Comparison

OX Security vs Apiiro: Head-to-Head

Supply Chain and Pipeline Security

OX Security was built with software supply chain security as a founding principle. The Pipeline Bill of Materials (PBOM) maps every stage of your software delivery pipeline — source code, dependencies, build tools, CI/CD configurations, artifact registries, and deployment targets. Combined with the OSC&R (Open Software Supply Chain Attack Reference) framework, OX provides a structured approach to identifying supply chain attack vectors and verifying the integrity of your build process.

Apiiro addresses supply chain risks through its code analysis and dependency tracking capabilities, but it does not have a dedicated supply chain framework on the level of OX’s PBOM. Apiiro tracks third-party components and their risks as part of its broader risk model, and it detects changes to dependencies through its material change detection engine. However, for organizations specifically concerned about build pipeline tampering, artifact integrity, or compliance with frameworks like SLSA and NIST SSDF, OX provides more targeted coverage.

If supply chain security is a board-level concern or a regulatory requirement, OX Security has the deeper toolkit.

Risk Analysis and Prioritization

Apiiro’s core strength is the Risk Graph — a multi-dimensional model that connects code, developers, infrastructure, and security findings to calculate risk based on actual business impact. The system considers factors like whether a vulnerability is in a crown-jewel application, whether the code was written by a junior developer working in an unfamiliar part of the codebase, and whether the affected component is reachable from the internet at runtime.

This contextual approach means Apiiro can tell you not just that you have a critical CVE, but that this specific instance matters because it is in a payment-processing service, the code was recently changed, and the component is exposed to the internet. That context dramatically changes how security teams prioritize their backlog.

OX Security also provides risk prioritization through exploitability and reachability analysis, aiming to reduce alert noise by up to 95 percent. OX’s approach focuses on whether a vulnerability is actually exploitable in your specific environment and whether there is a viable attack path from an attacker’s entry point to the vulnerable component. Both approaches are effective, but Apiiro’s developer-behavior and business-context dimensions add layers that OX does not currently match.

Developer Experience and Workflow Integration

Apiiro integrates directly with source control managers, creating risk-based guardrails in pull requests. When a developer opens a PR that introduces a material risk — changing authentication logic, adding a new dependency, or modifying code in a sensitive service — Apiiro flags it for additional review or triggers automated scans. This PR-level integration makes security visible at the point where developers make decisions.

OX Security’s VibeSec engine, introduced in 2026, brings real-time security awareness into every stage of development, including AI-generated code. OX integrates with CI/CD pipelines to enforce security policies during build and deployment, blocking releases that violate configured thresholds.

The distinction matters: Apiiro operates at the code change level (the PR), while OX operates at the pipeline and build level. Teams wanting feedback before code is merged lean toward Apiiro. Teams wanting enforcement at the deployment gate lean toward OX.

Compliance, Governance, and Tool Consolidation

OX Security’s supply chain focus aligns with SLSA, NIST SSDF, and software integrity requirements. The PBOM provides auditable evidence of every component and how it was built. Apiiro provides compliance coverage around application risk governance, tracking sensitive data flows and automating evidence collection for SOC 2 and PCI DSS.

Both platforms aggregate findings from dozens of security tools — OX integrates with over 100 scanners, and Apiiro connects to major SAST, SCA, DAST, and cloud security tools. The consolidation value lies in making that output actionable through correlation, deduplication, and prioritization. The difference is the lens: OX prioritizes through supply chain exploitability, Apiiro through business context and developer risk.

When to Choose OX Security vs Apiiro

Choose OX Security if:

• Software supply chain security is your primary ASPM concern
• You need PBOM and SBOM generation for compliance and audit requirements
• Pipeline integrity verification and build security are critical
• Your organization must comply with SLSA, NIST SSDF, or similar frameworks
• You want to consolidate 100+ security tool findings into a single platform
• Reducing alert noise through exploitability and reachability analysis is a priority

Choose Apiiro if:

• Contextual risk prioritization based on business impact is your top need
• You want risk-based guardrails embedded directly in pull requests
• Developer behavior and expertise tracking adds value to your risk model
• You need to identify when junior developers change sensitive, crown-jewel code
• Material change detection for triggering targeted security reviews is important
• Your security team needs to explain risk to stakeholders in business terms

Frequently Asked Questions

Written by

Suphi Cankurt

Suphi Cankurt is an application security enthusiast based in Helsinki, Finland. He reviews and compares 129 AppSec tools across 10 categories on AppSec Santa. Learn more.