Skip to content
Guide

What is ASPM?

Learn what ASPM is, why it matters, and how Application Security Posture Management unifies your AppSec tools into a single risk-prioritized view across the entire SDLC.

Suphi Cankurt
Suphi Cankurt
AppSec Enthusiast
Updated February 10, 2026
6 min read
0 Comments

What ASPM is

Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) is a category of tools that provides a unified view of security risk across all the applications an organization develops. Instead of forcing security teams to check SAST dashboards, SCA reports, DAST results, IaC scanners, and container security tools separately, ASPM pulls all of those findings into a single pane of glass.

The term was formalized by Gartner in 2023 to describe the growing need for an orchestration layer above individual AppSec tools. The problem it solves is straightforward: modern development teams generate findings from a dozen different scanners, and nobody has the time to manually correlate and prioritize thousands of alerts scattered across separate interfaces.

ASPM ingests vulnerability data from across the software development lifecycle, from code commit to production runtime. It deduplicates overlapping findings, enriches them with context like asset criticality and exploit availability, and produces a prioritized risk score that reflects actual business impact rather than raw CVSS numbers.

Gartner projects that 40 percent of organizations developing proprietary applications will deploy ASPM frameworks by 2026. For organizations in regulated industries, that figure rises to 80 percent by 2027.


Why ASPM matters

The average enterprise development team runs between five and fifteen distinct security tools. Each tool produces its own findings in its own format with its own severity scale. The result is alert fatigue, duplicated effort, and a security team that cannot answer a simple question: “What is the most important thing to fix right now?”

ASPM solves three specific problems:

Alert fatigue and deduplication. A single vulnerability in a shared library might trigger alerts in your SCA tool, your container scanner, and your IaC checker. Without ASPM, a developer might receive three separate tickets for the same issue. ASPM correlates these into a single finding.

Context-aware prioritization. A critical CVE in a library that is only used in a test environment is not the same as a critical CVE in a library that handles payment processing in production. ASPM combines vulnerability severity with business context, asset exposure, reachability analysis, and exploit intelligence to produce a risk score that reflects reality.

Governance and visibility. Security leaders need to report on posture across the entire application portfolio. ASPM provides dashboards and metrics that show trends over time, team-level performance, compliance coverage, and mean time to remediation, all without manual spreadsheet aggregation.


Key capabilities

Not every ASPM platform offers the same depth. Here are the core capabilities to evaluate:

CapabilityWhat It DoesWhy It Matters
Tool integrationIngests findings from SAST, DAST, SCA, IaC, CSPM, container, secrets scannersMore integrations = more complete risk picture
DeduplicationIdentifies overlapping findings from multiple toolsReduces noise by 30-70% in most deployments
Risk scoringCombines CVSS, EPSS, reachability, asset criticality, and exploit dataMoves prioritization from severity to actual risk
Policy engineDefines rules for SLAs, ownership, and auto-triageEnforces consistent standards across teams
Developer workflowCreates tickets in Jira, GitHub Issues, or Slack with remediation guidanceKeeps developers in their existing tools
Compliance mappingMaps findings to SOC 2, PCI DSS, NIST, ISO 27001Simplifies audit evidence collection
SBOM managementTracks software components across the portfolioSupports supply chain transparency requirements

The more mature platforms also offer attack-path analysis (tracing how a vulnerability could be exploited from the internet to sensitive data) and AI-assisted remediation suggestions that reduce the time developers spend researching fixes.


ASPM vs traditional tools

ASPM is not a replacement for your existing security scanners. It sits on top of them. Here is how it compares to the tools you already have:

AspectTraditional AppSec Tools (SAST, SCA, DAST)ASPM
ScopeSingle vulnerability type or phaseEntire SDLC, all vulnerability types
OutputRaw findings with tool-specific severityCorrelated, deduplicated, risk-ranked findings
PrioritizationCVSS-based, no business contextBusiness impact, reachability, exploit data
VisibilityPer-tool dashboardsPortfolio-wide risk posture
GovernanceManual aggregation for reportingAutomated compliance mapping and SLA tracking
RemediationDeveloper must switch between tool UIsUnified workflow with ticket creation and tracking

The analogy that works best: traditional AppSec tools are individual security cameras. ASPM is the monitoring room where all feeds come together and an operator can focus on what actually requires attention.

One common question is whether ASPM overlaps with CSPM (Cloud Security Posture Management). CSPM focuses on cloud infrastructure misconfigurations (S3 buckets, IAM policies, network rules). ASPM focuses on application-level vulnerabilities (code flaws, dependency risks, API weaknesses). Some vendors are merging both under broader posture management platforms, but the focus areas remain distinct.


Top ASPM tools

The ASPM market is maturing quickly. Here are the tools worth evaluating:

  • ArmorCode — Tool-agnostic ASPM that ingests findings from virtually any scanner. Strong risk-based prioritization and AI-powered remediation via its Anya engine. A solid choice for enterprises with a diverse, multi-vendor security stack.

  • Cycode — Combines proprietary scanners (SAST, SCA, secrets, IaC, CI/CD) with ASPM orchestration. The Context Intelligence Graph correlates findings across code, pipeline, and deployment. Best for teams that want scanning and ASPM from a single vendor.

  • Apiiro — Builds a continuous risk graph from code to cloud. Uses deep code analysis to assess business impact and applies risk-based guardrails in pull requests. Strong fit for organizations that want developer-facing risk context.

  • Legit Security — Focuses on software supply chain security alongside ASPM. Maps the entire SDLC pipeline and identifies risks in build processes, not just code. Useful for organizations with complex CI/CD environments.

  • Dazz — Emphasizes remediation efficiency with automated root-cause analysis and fix guidance. Correlates findings across code, cloud, and containers. Strong for teams that want to reduce mean time to remediation.

  • Kondukto — Orchestration-focused ASPM that integrates with 30+ scanner types. Policy-driven workflows and SLA management. Accessible pricing makes it viable for mid-market teams.

  • OX Security — Active ASPM that combines native scanning with pipeline security and attack-path analysis. The Pipeline Bill of Materials (PBOM) concept tracks software lineage from commit to deployment.


Getting started

Adopting ASPM requires preparation. Here is a practical path:

Inventory your current tools. List every security scanner you run, the vulnerability types it covers, and where in the SDLC it sits. This becomes your integration checklist. If you are running fewer than three tools, ASPM may be premature.

Define your risk model. Decide what “critical” means for your organization. Which applications handle sensitive data? Which are internet-facing? Which serve revenue-generating functions? ASPM needs this business context to prioritize effectively.

Start with integration, not replacement. Connect your existing scanners to the ASPM platform. Do not rip out tools you already use. The value of ASPM comes from correlation across tools, and that only works if the tools are feeding data in.

Establish ownership and SLAs. ASPM is most effective when every finding has a clear owner and a remediation deadline. Map applications to teams, set SLA targets by severity, and let the ASPM platform enforce them.

Iterate on triage rules. The first week will surface noise. Tune your deduplication rules, suppress confirmed false positives, and adjust risk weights. Most teams reach a stable configuration within the first month.

Measure progress. Track mean time to remediation, open vulnerability counts by severity, and SLA compliance rates. ASPM gives you these metrics automatically. Use them to demonstrate value and justify continued investment.


FAQ

This guide is part of our DevSecOps & AppSec Programs resource hub.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is ASPM in simple terms?
Application Security Posture Management is a category of tools that aggregates findings from all of your security scanners (SAST, DAST, SCA, IaC, container scanning, and more) into a single dashboard. Instead of switching between ten different tools, you see one prioritized list of risks ranked by business impact.
How is ASPM different from SAST or SCA?
SAST and SCA are individual scanners that find specific types of vulnerabilities. ASPM sits above them. It ingests findings from SAST, SCA, DAST, and any other scanner you run, deduplicates overlapping results, correlates context like reachability and deployment exposure, and gives you a single prioritized view. Think of ASPM as the orchestration layer; SAST and SCA are the instruments.
Do I still need individual scanners if I use ASPM?
Yes. ASPM does not replace scanners. It consumes their output. Some ASPM platforms bundle their own scanners (Cycode, for instance), but the core value is aggregation and prioritization across tools, not scanning itself.
When should a team adopt ASPM?
ASPM makes sense once you run three or more AppSec tools and struggle to prioritize across them. If your team spends more time triaging duplicate findings than fixing real vulnerabilities, that is a strong signal you need ASPM. Gartner projects 40 percent of organizations developing proprietary applications will deploy ASPM by 2026.
Is ASPM only for large enterprises?
Not anymore. Platforms like Kondukto and OX Security offer tiers that work for mid-market teams. That said, most ASPM value comes from correlating many tools across many applications. If you have one app and one scanner, ASPM adds overhead without much benefit.
What data does an ASPM platform need?
At a minimum, ASPM needs findings from your security scanners. Richer platforms also ingest code repository metadata, CI/CD pipeline events, cloud resource inventories, and runtime telemetry. The more context the platform has, the better it can prioritize.
Does ASPM help with compliance?
Yes. Most ASPM tools map findings to compliance frameworks like SOC 2, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, and NIST. They generate audit-ready reports showing which controls are covered and where gaps remain, which simplifies evidence gathering during audits.
Suphi Cankurt
Written by
Suphi Cankurt

Suphi Cankurt is an application security enthusiast based in Helsinki, Finland. He reviews and compares 129 AppSec tools across 10 categories on AppSec Santa. Learn more.

Comments

Powered by Giscus — comments are stored in GitHub Discussions.