Bright Security (formerly NeuraLegion) is a DAST platform built for developers, not security specialists. It plugs into CI/CD pipelines and delivers results with less than 3% false positives.

The platform covers OWASP Top 10, API Top 10, and LLM Top 10 vulnerabilities. According to the Verizon DBIR, web application attacks remain one of the top breach vectors, making CI/CD-integrated DAST scanning increasingly important. ISO 27701, ISO 9001, SOC 2, and Cyber Essentials certified.
Key Features
| Feature | Details |
|---|---|
| False positive rate | Less than 3% |
| Vulnerability coverage | OWASP Top 10, API Top 10, LLM Top 10 |
| Deployment | SaaS, Docker, CLI, Kubernetes |
| API scanning | OpenAPI/Swagger, GraphQL, HAR file replay |
| Remediation | AI-powered fix generation and validation |
| CI/CD support | GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, Jenkins, Azure DevOps |
| IDE support | VS Code, IntelliJ |
| Certifications | ISO 27701, ISO 9001, SOC 2, Cyber Essentials |

Scanning Modes
Bright supports multiple ways to define your scan target:
- Crawler — Point it at a URL and let it discover pages and endpoints automatically
- HAR file replay — Import recorded HTTP traffic and replay it with attack payloads
- OpenAPI/Swagger — Import your API specification for structured API testing
- GraphQL — Introspect and test GraphQL schemas

Docker and CLI Scanner
Run scans locally or in CI/CD without depending on the SaaS platform:
# Docker scan
docker run --rm brightsec/cli:latest scan:run \
--token $BRIGHT_API_TOKEN \
--name "My App Scan" \
--crawler https://example.com
# CLI scan with uploaded archive (HAR or API spec)
# First upload your HAR file or OpenAPI spec:
# bright-cli archive:upload --token $BRIGHT_API_TOKEN --archive ./traffic.har
# Then run the scan using the returned archive ID:
bright-cli scan:run \
--token $BRIGHT_API_TOKEN \
--name "Archive Scan" \
--archive ARCHIVE_ID
Integrations
Getting Started
npm install -g @brightsec/cli or pull the Docker image brightsec/cli:latest.--token flag on each command.bright-cli archive:upload.bright-cli scan:polling to wait for completion and fail on severity thresholds.Performance Claims
Bright publishes several customer metrics:
- 98% improvement in vulnerability remediation rates
- 10x more vulnerabilities fixed within the development process
- 50% reduction in remediation time through the AI validation loop
- 70% reduction in preliminary scan man-hours (from a ProCircular case study)
Limitations
Bright lacks the deep manual testing capabilities of Burp Suite. If you need an intercepting proxy and manual request manipulation, Bright is not the right tool. The platform is focused on automated CI/CD scanning, not hands-on security research. For compliance-heavy enterprise reporting, tools like Invicti or Acunetix may be more appropriate.
The scanner does not cover infrastructure or network-level vulnerabilities. Pair it with SAST for code-level analysis. For more on how DAST and SAST complement each other, see our SAST vs DAST vs IAST comparison. You can also explore free DAST tools if budget is a constraint.
